Protestant Church in People’s Republic of China

  Leeds East Asian Paper Monograph Series No.21(Leeds :University of Leeds,1996)。

  In December 1978,a group of reformist leaders in the Chinese Communist Party(CCP )initiated a series of reforms in economic,political,and social affairs.In early 1982,a thirty-page circular on religious policy ,known as “Document19”,was sent to leading cadres ,and an abstract of the document was publishedin the CCP theoretical journal Hongqi (“Red Flag”)in June 1982.[1]Violentsuppression of religion was repudiated,and freedom of belief accepted.However,while the new policy tolerated religious activities ,it also stated that theyshould be closely supervised,and that activities falling outside defined limitsshould be suppressed.Two kinds of illegal activity were specifically mentionedin the document :criminal and counter-revolutionary activities hiding behind thefacade of religion;and infiltration by hostile foreign forces.[2]

  Believers soon took advantage of this relative tolerance,and religious groupssprang up ,or came to the surface ,all over China.By the mid-1980s ,the rapidgrowth of religion alarmed scholars and officials ,who realized that religiousactivities,especially the so-called "Christianity Fever",were getting out ofhand.

  The Party's anxiety seems to have been based on several factors ,primarilythe risk that some religious institutions might become influential and form independentpower-bases outside Party control.It has been a central policy of the CCP to preventthe formation of any kind of mass organization except for a few (such as the tradeunions)wholly dominated by the Party apparatus.Second,religious beliefs tendto be anti-materialist and theist ,and they are therefore an ideological challengeto Marxism,the state orthodoxy.Third ,religious organizations might strengthendemands for autonomy among non-Han Chinese,for example in Xinjiang or Tibet.Fourth,the Party leadership was extremely worried by the overthrow of the Soviet governmentand its satellite states in Eastern Europe,and aware of the role played by churchesin the opposition to communist rule there.It feared a similar scenario in China,especially after 1989.

  Perhaps most significantly,the Party holds the view that many religious organizationsare infiltrated by,and working in the service of,"hostile foreign forces".Thisview is explicitly linked to the concept of "peaceful evolution",the claim thatthe West,in particular the USA,is using ideological penetration and subversionas a strategy to overthrow the Chinese government.Among the hostile foreign forcesallegedly infiltrating religious groups in the PRC are evangelical Protestants(for example the Southern Baptist Church has been accused of working for the CIA),Roman Catholics (accused of promoting the Vatican‘s interests ),and sectariangroups from Taiwan,such as the Yiguandao.

  Religious organizations have often been uncertain how to interpret the guidelinesof official policy.Officials have rarely made explicit public statements to clarifyexactly where the boundaries are to be drawn,and in fact it appears that evenhigh-level cadres ,not to mention lower-level officials ,are not at all surethemselves.At times of political tension ,particularly in the aftermath of the1989demonstrations ,there have been crackdowns on many religious groups,sometimeseven including the official churches who are correctly registered with,and vettedby,the Religious Affairs Bureau (RAB )。On the other hand,in the southernprovinces unregistered house churches may receive frequent visits from foreign Christians,presumably in defiance of the spirit and letter of Document 19,without much interferencefrom local officials.The situation is very fluid and depends on a number of factors:the national political scene ,the attitude of provincial leadership,or relationsbetween local religious groups and local cadres.

  To date ,the most illuminating documents concerning the local interpretationof religious policy have been a number of directives issued by government agencies,usually at city or provincial level ,to control religious affairs in their region.They are not normally made public ,but over the years some have been leaked toHong Kong and reprinted.Their general trend is to emphasize the restrictive aspectsof Document 19,for example those insisting that all religious activities shouldbe conducted in authorized,registered buildings ;that all Christian activitiesare supervised by the official church ;that religious literature may not be broughtin from overseas;and that activities like faith healing and exorcism(which donot conform with Marxist philosophy )are forbidden.

  A typical example is the "Regulation Concerning the Protection of Normal ReligiousActivities in the Hunan Christian Church",first adopted in 1981and revised in1990.[3]Among its stipulations are clauses such as "No meeting and sermon shouldrun counter to the four cardinal principles ,engage in propaganda which opposesMarxism ,Leninism or Mao Zedong Thought ,or interfere in politics ,educationor marriage …All illegal activities which are conducted in the name of evangelization…must be resolutely prevented…We do not approve any person from abroad to carryon religious activities within our boundaries."Through the 1980s and 1990s ,Protestantsoperated in this complex environment,where religious practice was officially tolerated,yet in practice restricted;where much depended on local negotiation and power-play;where they had to be extremely cautious about involvement in politics,and especiallyin their relations with visitors from overseas.

  Despite these difficulties,the Protestant community in China grew rapidly ,although its size has for a long time been a point of dispute.Many people,onhearing of the spread of Protestantism,ask a reasonable ,important,and apparentlysimple question :how many Protestants are there in contemporary China ?Typicalof the evangelical groups which report on China ,the Chinese Church Research Centerhas frequently published its view that there are more than sixty million Protestantsin China.[4]The Center has failed to explain its methodology in reaching this conclusion,except to say that it is based on work done by visitors and underground Christianleaders ,and that all details should remain secret for security reasons.Suchclaims then enter the evangelical myth:“After as close an investigation as itis possible to make in the existing circumstances ,the reputable Christian researchgroups conclude that there are now 40-50million Christians in China.Some otherchurch organizations put the figure much higher.”[5]

  We are inclined to be highly sceptical of such claims ,having concluded thatno estimates of Christians in China are based on sound methodology,definitions,or data collection procedures.[6]According to official Chinese sources ,thereare around nine to ten million Protestants;however,there are compelling reasonsto believe that the official estimates are far too low.A fairly detailed recentsurvey by the British researcher Anthony Lambert puts the figure at between eighteenand thirty million.One can probably adopt a working figure at somewhere aroundthis kind of level,but only as a gross approximation.But it is more importantto realize that church growth has indeed been rapid since 1949,and in some regionsProtestantism has become the dominant religion:it is especially strong in Yunnan,Zhejiang,Henan,and Anhui provinces.It is now a firmly established,integralpart of the national religious scene.

  Since research access is so difficult ,observers also find it hard to analysethe reasons for this rapid church growth.The authors have come to the conclusionthat the following are among the most important factors to consider :

  1.Christianity may be perceived and received as,in some sense,an improvementon traditional Chinese beliefs.If offers prayers ,healing,fellowship ,a moralcode,a rationale for suffering and the promise of salvation.It is wider in scope,more universal,less tied to traditional society than folk religion.

  2.It has a highly flexible and successful organizational form.Christian groupsrange from family prayer meetings ,to village communities addressed by itinerantpreachers ;from sophisticated underground networks to the powerful and efficientnational organization.

  3.The church benefited in the 1980s from the prestige of the West,as a symbolof a material and political system that many felt was superior to their own.InNovember 1994,an official inquiry in Henan province found that the growth ofthe Protestant church was partly due to foreign infiltration,combined with theweakening of communist ideology and education ,and the local cadres ‘attentionbeing focused on commercial rather than political work.

  4.Many believers were brought up in families or communities that had been Christianfor some time.Especially in the southeast of China and in cities like Shanghai ,we can conclude that present communities are descendants or extensions of previousones.

  5.A key strength of Protestantism has been its evangelistic nature ,in particulara strong oral culture focused on preaching and accounts of healing and miracles.

  6.It offers attractive forms of worship,especially the congregational aspectand music.Worship is a time of emotional release and spiritual enrichment.

  7.It offers self-respect and enhanced personal identity.The affirmation ofself-hood and individuality is much appreciated in a society which has been oppressedfor many decades.It may be relevant in a period of rapid social change in the directionof individualism and fragmentation of traditional communities.

  8.Church groups are a field where young people ,and especially women ,canfind scope for their talents as leaders ,scholars ,musicians,or organizers.For all who are excluded from the political and civil power-structure ,religionmay offer an alternative,productive outlet for their energies.[7]It is experiencedas a form of empowerment for marginalized groups.

  9.Many rural areas have not prospered during the recent reforms.They havemissed out on commercial growth ,and the previous socialist ideology has collapsed.Young people in particular may need a sense of mission in life,and evangelismis a viable option.Itinerant preachers ,many of whom are teenagers ,travelwidely,hosted by local Christian groups ;they feel themselves to be mandatedby God.Moreover,some overseas agencies are eager to help with their trainingand support.There is a curious parallelism between their Messianic excursions andthose of the Red Guards who spread the Word of Mao in the 1960s.

  10.In this context ,the eschatological tone of many Christian communitiesis very attractive to the poorer peasants ,whose life may often be harsher thanbefore the economic reforms :they look forward to the End-Time.

  It is precisely because these factors are so compelling that administrativemeasures to curb Protestantism have failed.It will probably be impossible to knowat what point ,after the closure of the churches in the late 1950s,undergroundChristian practice and evangelism became so powerful:some reports suggest thatit was during the chaotic years of the Cultural Revolution.The process was hastenedby several factors.Former Red Guards and political activists became disillusionedwith politics and turned to religion in the late 1970s;religious believers hadbeen displaced from their homes ,for example being sent to labour camps or remoterural areas ;many preachers had been imprisoned and thereby attained great sympathyand reputation among local Christians ;overseas Chinese Christians brought inBibles and other literature ;Gospel radios were effective in education and conversion.By this remarkable combination of circumstances ,millions of people convertedto the Protestant faith ,and started to participate in religious activities.

  Church institutions

  As we discuss church institutions since 1979,it is well to remember that currentrelations between the Chinese state and religious communities are the product ofa long historical development :the state has exerted control over religions atleast since the Tang dynasty.The concepts of separation of church and state,andof religious freedom,may be familiar in Western ecclesial and political traditions,but from the Chinese perspective they are alien.While it is true that the currentinstitutions can be repressive,rigid,and over-politicized ,it is more importantto understand their dynamics than to compare them with any“ideal ”foreign paradigm.Christians in China will create their own unique model of church-state relations.

  In 1979the Three-Self Patriotic Movement (TSPM)was reconstituted after itssuspension during the Cultural Revolution ,and soon afterwards a related organizationcalled the China Christian Council(CCC )was formed.These two organizations,known as the“lianghui”(“two committees”),form the state-sanctioned leadershipof the Protestant community.Their functions are not clearly delineated ,and manyleading figures hold positions in both organizations concurrently ,for exampleK.H.Ting(Ding Guangxun ),Bishop of Nanjing,being President of both.

  Power resides in the Standing Committees,which oversee church policy,relationswith overseas churches,pastoral affairs ,and personnel appointments.Most membersof the national Standing Committees are also leaders of provincial or municipalProtestant organizations which effectively supervise local church affairs.Theseleaders are nominally elected by the church members themselves,but in practicethey are usually Party nominees.They have considerable influence over all churchaffairs and closely supervise the activities of pastors and of lower-level TSPMgroups.

  This naturally leads to some resentment among Christian groups,who feel theyare under constant surveillance ,and that the church is run by non-Christians.The level of supervision is much higher in urban than rural areas ,because theapparatus is far from sufficient to monitor activities in remoter regions.Variousstate organs,such as the RAB,the United Front Work Department ,and differentbranches of the security services are also active in monitoring the Christian community,especially where there is any contact with foreigners.

  The original purposes of the TSPM were to eliminate foreign influence ,tounite Protestants in one organization ,and to promote CCP policies inside thechurch.This remains an important part of their work.However ,in the 1980s and1990s ,as the Protestant communities grew relatively strong ,the“two committees”also played a vital role in legitimizing and promoting the religion.The officialleaders have negotiated the return of church property ,the right to print Biblesand other literature,the opening of seminaries and thousands of churches and meetingpoints.Bishop Ting and others have been advocates of religious freedom.

  The TSPM is not a monolithic entity ,but a loose fellowship with many diverseviews.Many younger pastors (and some older ones )are rebellious ,and may refuseto accept the claim of their leadership to speak for the whole Protestant communityin China;there is a parallel with the state ,where there is vast regional diversityalongside the central government‘s claim to power.We therefore feel it is mistakensimply to regard the TSPM and all connected with it (as some have done )simplyas a puppet organization.

  The ecclesial phenomenon known as the “house church”movement is the othermajor institutional element of Chinese Protestantism.China has a long traditionof Christian home meetings,especially in rural areas.The religion was usuallyintroduced to a village by one or two families,and it might take several generationsbefore sufficient persons and funds were available to build a church.Also in cities,it was common for convert families to hold prayer meetings for themselves ,andperhaps their extended family ,in the privacy of their own homes.Moreover,theearlier part of the century saw a great deal of population movement and social unrest,while the communist period made public meetings unsafe,and church building impossible.In these circumstances,home meetings were often a more realistic alternative thantrying to maintain a public church.

  During the years of repression,the faith survived in this organizational form,and the home meetings indeed appear to have spread their influence during the 1960sand 1970s.In the 1980s ,home meetings and house churches expanded far beyondtheir original scope.Some of them developed extensive national and internationalnetworks,with thousands of members,and even publishing and educational facilities.To reflect this change,in our 1993publication we proposed the adoption of theterm“autonomous Christian communities”(ACCs)as now more appropriate than“house churches”to describe these groups.

  The church in China has a long tradition of lay leadership;this traditionalso contributes to the strength of the ACCs.In China,there has always been ashortage of trained professional staff relative to the number of believers.Onecause was the reluctance of missionaries before 1949to ordain Chinese nationals,and the lack of training facilities after 1949.The situation became more extremein the 1980s and 1990s,when congregations expanded extremely fast.Reports in1991showed that in many counties there were often only one or two pastors for thousandsof believers.[8]

  Most indigenous groups reject the concept of a professional ,trained clergy:some of the great heroes of the Chinese church ,for example Wang Mingdao ,John Sung (Song Shangjie ),and Watchman Nee (Ni Duosheng ),were neitherformally trained in a seminary,nor ordained.In fact,they openly opposed trainingschemes and opted for a master-disciple model.This is,of course,a deep-rootedChinese custom,and should be seen as a cultural rejection of standardized training,rather than a theological bias.

  Another cultural factor is the tradition that religious personnel should survivethrough donations rather than a salary.This concept often persuaded Chinese Christiansto work “by faith”as the most noble and respected way of life (and the contemptfor “rice-Christians ”is well-known )。Rejecting the security of employmentwith wealthy denominations has long been seen as the sign of a superior spirituality:one could either simply abandon oneself to the vagaries of believers ‘generosity,or become a “tent maker”,having one ’s own profession while serving voluntarilyin the ministry.

  The doctrines and ecclesiology of the ACCs are diverse.Many inherit practicesfrom groups that were formed in the 1920s.Interaction with popular culture hassometimes led to syncretism with local cults,and in some areas a Pentecostaliststyle of worship has been practised since around 1910.Phenomena such as speakingin tongues and faith healing are widespread and influential ,but many groups,on the contrary ,are pietistic:for example,most “Little Flock”congregationsare opposed to charismatic styles of worship,and place emphasis on literal beliefin the Bible,and on what they assert are Apostolic traditions.

上一篇:Church,State and Community in East Asia:An Introduction

下一篇:“文件政治”:当下中国乡村治理研究的新视角

免责声明:本文仅用于学习和交流目的,不代表素心书斋观点,素心书斋不享任何版权,不担任何版权责任。

 

拥有另外一些经验

最近,产生在布拉格这个美丽而痛苦的地区的本世纪重要作家昆德拉(1929— —)和哈维尔(1936——)被人们同时谈起,1998年《上海文学》第10期上刊登了以徐友渔先生为主的一组文章。徐友渔先生文章的题目即是《昆德拉 哈维尔和我们》,其中提出了非常有意义的思考,引起了颇为广泛的关注。随后,读到发表在《文论报》1998年11月出版的第448期上余杰的文章《昆德拉与哈维尔——我们选择什么,我们承担什么》,却令人感到十分惊讶。在这里,本来是非常复杂、有着太多牵连的问题被做了简单化的处理,哈维尔和昆德拉之间可能拥有的共同之处被抹杀,他……去看看

中国软实力研究批判

说明:本文所说的“软实力”,英文词即“soft power”,目前国内学者在此词的翻译上没有达成共识,常见的有“软力量”、“软权力”以及“软实力”。但尽管如此,它们之间的内涵并无多大区别,因此能够互用。另外,本文所说的“软实力研究”指的是中国学术界在国际关系领域中对“软实力”的研究,不涉及其它诸如社 会、企业等领域的软实力研究。  (1)  自从约瑟夫·奈在上世纪80年代末90年代初首开“软实力”(soft power)研究的先河以来,在过去……去看看

探索民间组织最佳的生存环境

摘要:随着民间组织在中国的迅猛发展,很多学者开展以民间组织为视角研究中国的“国家—社会”关系。研究的方法主要有“公民社会”和“法团主义”两大理论模式,随着选取民间组织的不同,得出的结论无外乎是,社会对国家有着一定的依附性,或国家和社会之间存在交互关系;一个共同的结论是,国家与社会目前这种关系是不稳定的,需要转变,但怎样转变却莫衷一是。我们知道,在中国,无论是静态还是动态地分析国家与社会之间的结构都不能忽视对党的关注,这里,我们同样以民间组织为视角来考察国家与社会的关系,但引入政党的因素,探讨党在构建和谐社会……去看看

美国仍在提防中国

尽管中国领导人一再挽留,美国国务卿鲍威尔还是来也匆匆、去也匆匆,仅在中国呆了一天,就马不停蹄赶赴澳洲,参加由澳洲联邦外交部长唐纳、国防部长李夫和美国国防部长拉姆斯菲尔德等人组成的澳美防卫与安全部长级会议。  显然,鲍威尔或者说美国政府的选择,还是轻重有别的,哪为主要,哪为次要,不会被他人的意愿而所左右。相形之下,中国人对于鲍威尔访华意义的着力宣传,不能不说有夸大的嫌疑,虽然实事求是地说,美国国务卿来到中国,确是中美关系有所改善的一个标志,但这种改善究竟是实质性的还是表面化的,却还不宜妄下结论。  至少,仅就鲍……去看看

美国的“法治设计”对其经济效率的支持

迄今为止一个公认的事实是,美国一方面具有最“古老”的自治实践、法治传统和当今世界上最庞大、最完备的法律制度体系,另一方面,美国又拥有当代西方乃至整个世界的最成熟的市场机制、最系统的现代企业制度和比较有效率的宏观调控组织。本文拟借助“人本主义经济学”的思想成果,探讨社会法律制度界面和经济机制界面之间各主要接口的设计原理,判别美国社会法律制度对于其经济机制的支持效率和相容程度。     一、美国法治设计的特殊条件和基本意图     关于“法治”比“人治”优越和民主法治的基本形式等问题,欧洲众多……去看看

中国战略文化的重构:一项研究议程

文章来源:《教学与研究》2006年第1期【内容提要】中西方学者对中国战略文化的解读体现出深刻的不同。作者在对比分析之后指出,中国战略文化建立在“仁”、“礼”、“德”、“和”等传统基础观念之上,十一届三中全会以来,邓小平毅然改变了过时的战略判断,把中国的战略思维从战争与革命的框架之中解放出来,纳入到和平与发展的新轨道之上,战争的可避免性、对手的可合作性、暴力效用的降低都是中国战略文化变革的重要表现,并以新安全观的提出为主要标志。作者总结指出,在当前的国际、国内情势之下,如何在道德主义与现实主义之间构建……去看看

新中国60年“政府主导型”发展模式的形成与演变

原载《教学与研究》2009年第10期  [摘要]由于国际环境和人均资源压力,由于新民主主义革命的结果以及历史文化传统的影响,新中国成立以后我国即实行了强大的政府主导型经济发展模式,这个模式在1956年社会主义改造完成以后到1978年改革开放前的22年达到了极端,政府几乎成为唯一的资源配置和经济决策者,这种体制虽然保证了国家安全和建立起工业化的基础,但是也抑制了经济活力及人民生活水平的提高。1978年以后的改革开放,实质上是政府逐渐将微观经济让渡给市场调节,将资源配置和经济决策权逐渐下放给企业和人民的过程。如何协调……去看看

新二元社会与中国社会转型研究

原载《中国社会科学》2007年第1期  新二元社会是指传统计划体制的社会机制和市场化社会机制共生的社会结构,是对中国改革进程的一种新的理解,也是分析中国社会转型的新视角。老工业基地社会既是探讨新二元社会的逻辑切入点,又是新二元社会研究的主要对象;它不是一个经济、技术和产业概念,而是对一种独特的社会结构特征的认识。新二元社会的实质是与一定产权关系相联系的两种社会生活的组织方式和文化模式。连续的强有力的政治体制,是新二元社会生成的前提,也是整合两种社会机制的条件;它事实上的存在和作用,是认识中国的市场……去看看

区域政府合作:区域经济一体化的路径选择

文章刊发于《政治学研究》2004年第1期  内容提要:区域经济一体化是全球化时代世界经济发展的一大趋势。中国加入WTO 以后,在加快与国际社会接轨、尽快融入全球化世界的同时,如何加强国内各区域间的经济合作以实现区域经济一体化,同样是中国政府必须面对的一个重大课题。本文从分析我国区域经济一体化实现的体制性障碍入手,探讨了现阶段我国区域经济一体化的路径选择问题,认为区域政府合作是现有体制下实现区域经济一体化的理性选择。基于此一认识,作者提出了区域政府合作机制的建构及其原则,指出:构建区域政府合作机制必须要……去看看

公务员行政意识的比较性分析

内容概要:本文主要是希望说明行政意识在提高效率和促进廉洁方面是否能起到作用,以及究竟能在何种程度上发挥影响。在指出行政意识的两种基本类型之后,我们追溯回遥远的古代探求它们的起源和发展,并把它们归结于东西方两种不同传统的产物。最后我们指出行政意识对于行政人员以至整个行政组织的作用,并且倡导带有奉献性质的行政意识。  关键词: 行政意识 行政人员 官僚意识 公仆精神 伦理准则 意识形态 特权观念 奉献精神  正文目录:   第一章:导论——现实生活中的比较性分析  第二章:专制王权的衍生物  第三章:欧洲大……去看看

泛审美时代的快感体验

[内容摘要]:技术和市场在文化领域的强力介入使当今时代出现了一种明显的文化泛化与审美泛化的趋势,其具体表现就是大众文化的崛起与日常生活审美化的转型。面对这种深刻的世俗化和广泛的民主化浪潮,高雅文化的至高地位和传统研究的学科视野经受到强大冲击,传统的经典艺术的创造方式和审美批评理念不再适用于新兴的大众文化或者大众艺术。从经典艺术美的陶冶到关注身体感觉和生理欲念的快感美学,从经典艺术的“人”之代言到当代文化的大众体验,从经典艺术的文字想象到大众文化的图像复现,从经典艺术的观念幻象到大众文化的身体……去看看

开会:制度化仪式及其对当代社会观念和政治文化的影响

作者:浙江财经学院法学院副教授   自上而下的制度化开会仪式是中国特有的政治运作模式。当代中国几乎所有的重大变化都是通过开会发生的。不仅如此,借助于媒体的全方位配合与强力宣传,开会这一少数与会者之间的互动还深深地影响着社会生活的每一个角落,开会的结构与内容在一定程度上引导着社会行为、思想和情感的制度化。正是在开会与媒体持续不断的密切配合与互动中,当局界定了民众的观念情境,编织起说明社会行动与生活的叙事“框架”,模塑了民众认识社会的视角。笔者在本文中运用社会学中符号互动理论(symbolic interacti……去看看

“后主义”与启蒙

自五四新文化运动以来,中国进步的知识分子一直以启蒙为己任, (1) 尽管由于内乱或外患,启蒙的进程屡屡被打 断,但启蒙的话语一直不绝如缕,启蒙精神一直得到正面评价。各个时代的守旧势力或统治者,虽然竭力阻止或扼杀启蒙,但多 半另寻借口,未敢正面理直气壮地否定,更无能力在思想理论上加以贬斥。但进入九十年代之后,情况有了变化,从各种“后主 义” ( 如后现代主义、东方主义、后殖民主义、后新时期文化批评等等 ) 衍生出来的“后话语”对近代和当代、西方和中国的启蒙 做了正面的、猛烈的攻击,中国近代以来的精神和文化价值取向,似……去看看

观念的碰撞与社会的进步

《马克思主义与现实》杂志社决定试行特邀栏目主持人制度,承蒙抬爱,让我来打头设栏。其实我什么也没有做,就是约请了两位海外著名学者,即美国的阿里夫·德里克教授和德国的托马斯·海贝勒教授,分别惠寄两篇大作,专供本刊发表。我原先的设想是,再约请一位国内学者,但因为时间紧迫,我约了几次,这些学者朋友均告没有现成的定稿,而特地撰写又来不及,只好作罢。在这里我要特别感谢两位海外学者朋友,他们都在最短的时间内把其最新研究成果贡献给我们,这是对我本人及《马克思主义与现实》杂志的热情支持。严肃的学者常常也充满着温馨的友谊。……去看看